Author: Gary Shaffer

Employment Mediation: How Long Does It Take?

{4 minutes to read} This is the third of four blog posts about how long a mediation should be expected to take. Spoiler alert: The answer for each is “It Depends.” The first two blogs addressed commercial and divorce mediations. This one will address employment mediations.

Employment mediations often have something in common with divorce mediations. The parties have had an ongoing relationship that has fizzled. There is almost always anger and resentment from the plaintiff/former employee, and even from the employer, who typically feels its actions were justified. Think of the spouse who initiates the divorce as the employer and the spouse who wants to remain married as the employee. Like marriages, employers and employees often stay connected even after the relationship has soured.

Divorce Mediation: How Long Does it Take?

No Comments on Divorce Mediation: How Long Does it Take?

{4:30 minutes to read} One question I always get whenever someone calls about a divorce mediation is, “How long does it usually take?” The “It depends” answer to this one is far more accurate than in most other mediations.

Many non-divorce mediations take a full day. There is something about participants getting tired and it getting dark that stimulates movement. No one wants to leave after 8, 10, or 12 hours with nothing to show for it.

In divorce mediations, a similar process plays out, but never in one day. And single sessions rarely go over two hours. Couples get exhausted by that point. Plus they need to reflect on and sometimes even live with issues, emotions, and possible decisions.

How Long Does a Mediation Take?

{3:30 minutes to read} Someone recently asked me how long I would expect a mediation to take. I thought hard for two or three milliseconds and said, “It depends.”

So, how long should one expect a mediation to take? I’m glad you asked. I’ll address different areas of mediation length over the next few blog posts, but let’s start with a commercial case.

Employment Mediation — If Not Now, When?

{3:30 minutes to read} I recently had a conversation with two attorneys in an employment matter that came my way through a court annexed mediation program that automatically sends all employment cases to mediation.

I have written before about the benefits of “mandatory mediation,” which until somewhat recently was often thought of as an oxymoron. One axiom of mediation has been that the parties are in charge of the process, including the decision whether or not to mediate. However, it turns out this theory has some flaws. The most serious is that many litigants would love to try to resolve their cases early on, but don’t want to make the first move in suggesting mediation for fear it will be a sign of weakness.

New Tax Rules Make 2018 “The Year of the Divorce”

No Comments on New Tax Rules Make 2018 “The Year of the Divorce”

{4 minutes to read} Breakin’ up is not just hard to do—it’s often expensive. But for the past 75 years or so, alimony has been deductible for the payor and income to the payee. This often helped soften the economic fallout of divorce by allowing the higher-earning spouse to pay alimony to the lower-earning spouse so the “family” could reduce its overall tax burden. Since child support is neither income nor deductible, couples often agreed to allocate more money to alimony and less to child support to increase the overall pot available to the family post divorce.

Mediation? Arbitration?

No Comments on Mediation? Arbitration?

{4:12 minutes to read} When arbitration first became popular, it was seen as an antidote to the time and expense of litigation. Parties could bypass the lengthy court process, narrow the issues, limit discovery, and hire experts to decide disputes. Arbitration also kept disputes private, making it less likely the terms of a settlement or adverse decision would become public.

However, over the past 10 years, arbitration has begun to lose some of its luster for several reasons. Most well-known are the compulsory arbitration clauses found in consumer contracts (e.g., “Click here if you agree with the terms and conditions…”) that are often seen as unfairly favoring parties with greater economic power and limiting the ability to redress legitimate grievances.

347-314-2163